Our doctors

Dr Chetna Ghura, MBBS MD Dermatology, with Delhi Medical Council registration DMC 2851, is the lead dermatologist and clinical decision-maker at Delhi Derma Clinic. She owns assessment, recommendation, and care-plan responsibility across the dermatology pathway. The Dr Chetna Ghura page covers the wider professional profile in detail.

MBBS is the primary medical degree (Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery), the foundation qualification for medical practice in India. MD Dermatology is the postgraduate medical degree in dermatology, venereology, and leprology after the MBBS, reflecting three years of postgraduate dermatology training under recognised teaching institutions. The combination is the dermatology-specialist credential within Indian medical training.

Delhi Medical Council (DMC) registration is the medical-board registration that authorises medical practice in the Delhi jurisdiction. The registration number DMC 2851 is the publicly verifiable record of registration. Patients can verify the registration through the Delhi Medical Council's public register. The framework treats medical-board registration as the credentialing floor for clinical work rather than as a marketing line.

Dermatology is the postgraduate medical specialty for skin, hair, and nail medicine alongside selected procedural pathways. MD-Dermatology training is not equivalent to cosmetology certifications, short-course skin training, or other non-postgraduate routes — diagnostic and pharmacological scope differ. The framework positions the dermatologist as the clinical decision-maker rather than the front-desk advisor or the device-operator alone.

The dermatologist owns the case across the consultation, written plan, and follow-up framework. Where additional medical specialties are clinically relevant the framework collaborates with appropriately credentialed practitioners outside the dermatology pathway rather than absorbing decisions outside its scope. The patient's care plan stays with the dermatologist as the consistent reference point.

For selected pathway elements, trained clinical-team members operate calibrated procedural protocols under the dermatologist's supervision and within scopes the framework establishes. Assessment, recommendation, and care-plan ownership sit with the dermatologist as the clinical decision-maker; the framework does not transfer those to a non-medical team-member. Procedural-step operation by a trained operator under supervision is part of standard medical-clinic practice; clinical decision-making is not transferred.

Individual team-member profile pages are part of the doctor profile section structure within the website. Where the credential information for an individual team member has been documented and the person has consented to public-profile publication, the corresponding profile page carries the substantive content. Team-profile pages without verified credential documentation are kept as orientation entries within the framework rather than published with un-verified detail.

Where additional medical specialties are clinically relevant — internal medicine for systemic context, gynaecology for selected hormonal contexts, surgical referral for specific cases, paediatrics for selected paediatric-dermatology presentations — the framework collaborates with appropriately credentialed practitioners outside the dermatology pathway rather than absorbing decisions outside its scope. Referral is treated as patient-care continuity within the framework rather than as competitive friction.

No. The framework operates the same dermatologist-led consultation framework across acne, pigmentation, anti-ageing, hair-fall, laser-hair-reduction, body-contouring, and selected medical-dermatology presentations. Concern-specific calibration shapes the recommendation; the framework structure remains consistent across concern types.

Where additional team-member credentials become formally documented and the team-member consents to public-profile publication, the corresponding profile pages will be populated with substantive content per the framework. The framework does not pre-publish unverified credential claims. For any specific question about a team-member at a current visit, patients can ask directly at the consultation.

The dermatologist\'s clinical decision-making is supported by structured history-taking, calibrated examination, dermoscopy and selected in-clinic tools where the differential warrants them, photographic baseline establishment for selected pathways, blood-work request where systemic context is suggested, and the broader evidence base for the dermatology field. The framework treats clinical decision-making as substantive work rather than a scripted display.

Established patients have their case context maintained across follow-up visits — prior history, photographic baseline, prior pathway responses, and the calibrated written plan all stay accessible to the dermatologist for ongoing review. The framework treats records as patient-supportive rather than as proprietary clinic information; patient access to their own record is part of the framework documented in the Patient Privacy and Records Policy.

The clinical approach page, the safety standards page, the clinic hygiene protocol page, the editorial standards page, and the medical review process page together document the quality-assurance framework. The framework treats these as substantive standards rather than as decorative pages, and every clinical content page on the site carries the reviewer signature.

Each clinical page across the site carries Dr Chetna Ghura's reviewer signature with the lastReviewed date and the schema-graph data. A structured review cycle drives the medical review process, with explicit nextReviewDue dating. When prevailing dermatology-evidence shifts on a pathway, the corresponding page is revised and re-dated rather than allowed to drift.

Second opinions are a normal part of patient decision-making and the framework supports them. Where a patient wishes to consult another dermatologist before proceeding, the consultation summary and any photographic documentation can typically be made available for the patient's reference. The framework treats second-opinion-seeking as patient-supportive rather than as challenging.

Delhi Medical Council registration DMC 2851 for Dr Chetna Ghura is publicly verifiable through the DMC public register. The framework publishes the registration number explicitly so patients can verify rather than relying on website claims alone. Patients with specific credentialing questions can ask at the consultation; the framework treats credentialing transparency as substantive.

The Doctor and Consultation FAQs page covers credentialing context (the MBBS-then-MD-Dermatology pathway, the difference from cosmetology certifications), consultation flow, decision-making, and follow-up structure in question-answer format. It complements this page\'s narrative framing.

The framework operates within prevailing medical-advertising regulation. Doctor-profile pages carry the verified credentials and the substantive professional context where the credential information has been documented, rather than promotional superlatives ("top-rated dermatologist in Delhi", "leading specialist", "rapid-result"). The editorial standards page covers the editorial framework around doctor-profile content.

For most cases the patient is seen by Dr Chetna Ghura across consultation and follow-up visits. Selected procedural steps within the pathway may be operated by trained clinical-team members under supervision. The clinical decision-making and care-plan ownership stay with the dermatologist; case continuity is part of how the framework operates.

Patient autonomy is substantive in the framework. Whether and when a patient proceeds with any pathway remains the patient's decision. Staged commitment, second-opinion seeking, deferral, and discontinuation are each supported within the framework where they fit the clinical calibration, without being treated as failures.

Individual doctor profile pages sit at /doctors/[slug]/ within the website structure. The lead dermatologist Dr Chetna Ghura's page at /doctors/chetna-ghura/ is the populated profile reflecting the verified credential information. Additional team-member profile pages are part of the site structure; profile content publication on those pages follows the same framework around verified credentialing and explicit consent to public-profile publication.

Doctor profile pages on the site carry the same editorial and reviewer-signature framework as the rest of the clinical content. Each page carries the lastReviewed date and the nextReviewDue date; selected pages also carry the explicit reviewer signature with the DMC registration. This dating is treated as substantive transparency rather than decorative metadata.

Team-member privacy is handled per the Patient Privacy and Records Policy framework around personal data and per the team-member's explicit consent to public-profile publication. Where the team-member's consent has not been formally captured, the corresponding profile page is kept as an orientation entry rather than published with substantive personal detail.